Hay is a fascinating town - but there's more to it than bookshops! I like to take a look behind the scenes, at what the locals are doing.
I also maintain the Fairtrade Hay blog, and Morwenna's Tower, a blog about my writing and other interests.
Written by a prat. If you can't be bothered to vote you forfeit your right to criticise. Contrary to what this moron wrote, apathy really doesn't rule.
Excellent sign. The thing is though to spoil your ballot rather than not vote. That way your voice is heard clearly - I don't want any of these in office.
Perhaps if just one of the candidates had been a little less vague, and more specific on how they would help people...
"If you can't be bothered to vote you forfeit your right to criticise."
Then it's impossible to criticise the quality of candidates on offer by witholding one's vote?
I would have said we have the right NOT to vote, and that it's the perfect equal of the right TO vote. The two aren't mutually exclusive in a true democracy, and there shouldn't be the possibilty of practical or theoretical sanctions, either way. We shouldn't be made under some kind of technical duress to enter a polling booth any more than we should be prevented from going into one if we choose.
If - for any reason - one chooses not to vote (or perhaps couldn't for some unimpeachable reason), are you seriously suggesting that that person should suspend the exercise of their critical faculties for some period?
6 comments:
I beg to differ!
Outstanding! And what's more, Somebody speaks out like this and guess what.....?
Nobody listens!
Written by a prat. If you can't be bothered to vote you forfeit your right to criticise. Contrary to what this moron wrote, apathy really doesn't rule.
Excellent sign. The thing is though to spoil your ballot rather than not vote. That way your voice is heard clearly - I don't want any of these in office.
Perhaps if just one of the candidates had been a little less vague, and more specific on how they would help people...
"If you can't be bothered to vote you forfeit your right to criticise."
Then it's impossible to criticise the quality of candidates on offer by witholding one's vote?
I would have said we have the right NOT to vote, and that it's the perfect equal of the right TO vote. The two aren't mutually exclusive in a true democracy, and there shouldn't be the possibilty of practical or theoretical sanctions, either way. We shouldn't be made under some kind of technical duress to enter a polling booth any more than we should be prevented from going into one if we choose.
If - for any reason - one chooses not to vote (or perhaps couldn't for some unimpeachable reason), are you seriously suggesting that that person should suspend the exercise of their critical faculties for some period?
"The thing is though to spoil your ballot rather than not vote. That way your voice is heard clearly."
No it isn't. The teller looks at your spoilt paper and destroys it. What have you gained from that pointless exercise, Eddie?
Post a Comment